Yu Shuangen, Li Si, Gao Shikai, Wang Mei, Meng Jiajia, Tang Shuhai. Effect of controlled irrigation and drainage on water saving, nitrogen and phosphorus loss reduction with high yield in paddy field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2018, 34(7): 128-136. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.07.017
    Citation: Yu Shuangen, Li Si, Gao Shikai, Wang Mei, Meng Jiajia, Tang Shuhai. Effect of controlled irrigation and drainage on water saving, nitrogen and phosphorus loss reduction with high yield in paddy field[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2018, 34(7): 128-136. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.07.017

    Effect of controlled irrigation and drainage on water saving, nitrogen and phosphorus loss reduction with high yield in paddy field

    • Abstract: In order to integrate water-saving irrigation and controlled drainage technology reasonably and realize the multiple targets including water saving, high yield and pollution alleviation by scientific irrigation and drainage program, this paper carried out a field plot experiment in Lianshui Water Conservancy Research Institute from 2015 to 2016. In the field trial, the water level of paddy field was taken as the technical indicator of irrigation and drainage control, and the amount of irrigation, drainage, leakage, yield and loss of nitrogen and phosphorus in paddy field were monitored and analyzed. A total of 3 treatments were designed in the field test plot, including CK (controlled irrigation and traditional drainage), LCID (controlled irrigation and drainage that allowed mild water stress) and HCID (controlled irrigation and drainage that allowed severe water stress). These 2 kinds of controlled irrigation and drainage procedures both added the allowed flooding depth after rain but had different lower limits of irrigation, one of which was -200 mm and the other of which was -500 mm. The results showed that compared with CK, the utilization of LCID can reduce 11.89% of the irrigation quota and 52.72% of the drainage amount. At the same time, the runoff losses of the total phosphorus (TP), ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) and nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N) were significantly decreased by 54.58%, 36.29% and 60.10% respectively owing to the drop of drainage peak value and drainage times during the critical periods, but the leaching losses of TP and NH4+-N increased on the account of higher seepage in the rain spell. Meanwhile, by comparison with CK, the irrigation times deducted, irrigation amount saved by 29.88% and drainage amount reduced by 58.95% under HCID. Besides, the runoff losses of TP, NH4+-N and NO3--N were significantly decreased by 59.23%, 38.88% and 62.97% respectively, but the leaching losses of those were increased by 24.57%, 30.17% and 15.88% which would be likely to cause groundwater contamination and soil nutrients loss. In terms of rice yields and its components, LCID and HCID cut down the number of effective panicles per square meters, but the theoretical and actual rice yield showed no significant decline. On the basis of test results, this paper optimized the irrigation and drainage schemes so as to guide practice in southern China rice cultivable area. The evaluation index system was comprised of 3 first-class indexes as field, water-saving and pollution control and 9 second-class indexes. In addition, the combination weights method based on rank correlation analysis method and entropy method was used to obtain the weights of evaluation index, in addition, TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution) served as decision-making method. The evaluation results revealed that LCID had great water conservation benefit and pollutant abatement effect on the premise of ensuring grain production.
    • loading

    Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return