田亚亚, 姜广辉, 何新, 曲衍波, 周丁扬. 北京市平谷区农村居民点内部用地结构差异分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(17): 263-273. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.17.032
    引用本文: 田亚亚, 姜广辉, 何新, 曲衍波, 周丁扬. 北京市平谷区农村居民点内部用地结构差异分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(17): 263-273. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.17.032
    Tian Yaya, Jiang Guanghui, Hexin, Qu Yanbo, Zhou Dingyang. Internal land use structure differences of rural settlements in Pinggu District, Beijing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(17): 263-273. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.17.032
    Citation: Tian Yaya, Jiang Guanghui, Hexin, Qu Yanbo, Zhou Dingyang. Internal land use structure differences of rural settlements in Pinggu District, Beijing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2019, 35(17): 263-273. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2019.17.032

    北京市平谷区农村居民点内部用地结构差异分析

    Internal land use structure differences of rural settlements in Pinggu District, Beijing

    • 摘要: 研究微观尺度农村居民点内部用地结构差异有利于因地制宜、差异化开展农村居民点内部用地结构调整,分类指导农村居民点用地科学规划与管理,提高农村居民点内部土地利用效率。本文以北京市平谷区为例,利用基于功能的农村居民点内部用地分类体系,调查了5个不同发展类型农村居民点内部用地结构差异,对比分析了其用地微观结构特点。研究发现:生活功能用地为农村居民点内部用地的基本结构,生产功能用地为衍生结构,生态功能用地为辅助结构,潜在功能用地为可变结构。受自然条件、区位条件、经济水平、产业结构与生计类型及政策条件等5维驱动因素共同作用,不同发展类型农村居民点内部用地数量结构、类型结构及信息熵差异显著,空间结构则呈现趋同性。随着社会经济发展水平提高,农村居民点用地结构表现出生活功能用地稳定、生产功能用地增加、生态功能用地减少的趋势。村庄规划应在把握其内部用地结构演变规律的基础上,注重可变影响因素调整,促进用地结构与其发展条件和谐统一。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Studying the internal structure differences of rural residential land on the micro scale is conducive to timely adjusting the management measures of rural settlements, adapting local conditions and differentiation to promote the adjustment of the internal land use structure in rural settlements, guiding the scientific planning of rural residential land according to different types and improve the land use efficiency within rural settlements. Taking Pinggu District of Beijing as an example, this paper conducts a survey and comparative analysis of the internal land use structure of five rural settlements with different development types by using the function-based internal land use structure classification system and the method of combination coefficient and the order degree of the internal land use structure in rural settlements. The research shows that the living function land is the basic land use structure in rural settlements, the production function land is the derivative structure, the ecological function land is the auxiliary structure, and the potential function land is the variable structure. To a certain extent, the absolute dominance of land use structure in rural settlements is associated with a single industrial structure and land use type, which indicates that the competitive advantage in rural areas is weak and the driving force for economic development is obviously insufficient. In accordance with the development types of rural settlements, there are obvious differences in the land combination types of the five typical rural residential areas. Affected by the five-dimensional driving factors such as natural conditions, location conditions, economic level, industrial structure, livelihood types and policy conditions, the internal land quantity structure, combination types and information entropy of different development types in rural settlements are significantly different, while the spatial structure shows convergence. With the social and economic development level improving, the land use structure of rural settlements shows a trend of stable change in living function land, an increase in production function land and a decrease in ecological function. The optimization of rural land use structure should pay attention to the adjustment of its variable influencing factors to form a harmonious unity between land use structure and its development conditions so as to promote rural economic development. Village planning should promote the improvement of rural land on the basis of fully evaluating the development level and development potential of rural settlements. First of all, with the goal of improving the quality of rural living space, measures should be adjusted to local conditions to carry out homestead replacement and site renewal, speed up the construction of village infrastructure and public service facilities, and carry out rural hollowing-out. In addition, we should give full play to the comparative advantages of various villages in agricultural and industrial production, develop modern agriculture, improve agricultural production technology and level, and carry out agricultural industrialization pilot projects. Meanwhile, we should also promote industrial production scale and industrial land use efficiency by adjusting industrial structure and improving industrial production technology. Villages endowed with characteristic resources should make rational use of their resources to develop rural tourism and characteristic industries, and form a benign mutual promotion mechanism between the protection of characteristic resources and the development of villages. At the same time, we should actively carry out farmland consolidation, develop unused land and reclaim or return green according to local conditions to increase rural ecological space and improve the rural living environment.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回