刘霈珈, 吴克宁, 罗明, 李晨曦, 祝培甜, 张倩, 许伟伟. 农用地土壤重金属超标评价与安全利用分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(23): 254-262. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.23.035
    引用本文: 刘霈珈, 吴克宁, 罗明, 李晨曦, 祝培甜, 张倩, 许伟伟. 农用地土壤重金属超标评价与安全利用分区[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(23): 254-262. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.23.035
    Liu Peijia, Wu Kening, Luo Ming, Li Chenxi, Zhu Peitian, Zhang Qian, Xu Weiwei. Evaluation of agricultural land soil heavy metal elements exceed standards and safe utilization zones[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(23): 254-262. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.23.035
    Citation: Liu Peijia, Wu Kening, Luo Ming, Li Chenxi, Zhu Peitian, Zhang Qian, Xu Weiwei. Evaluation of agricultural land soil heavy metal elements exceed standards and safe utilization zones[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2016, 32(23): 254-262. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.23.035

    农用地土壤重金属超标评价与安全利用分区

    Evaluation of agricultural land soil heavy metal elements exceed standards and safe utilization zones

    • 摘要: 土地资源是大自然馈赠给人类的独特珍品,承载万物。开展区域农用地土壤重金属超标评价与安全利用分区、分类利用管控,促进区域土地资源合理、高效利用是新常态下耕地保护的基本要求。该文分不同pH值区间、8种不同地类,基于现行土壤环境质量评价和食品安全评价的众多标准集成土壤环境质量现状评价标准,以江苏省某市为例,运用单因子指数法、内梅罗综合指数法和潜在生态危害指数法开展土壤重金属超标评价,进而提出了安全利用等级划分方案和分区、分类利用与管理的管控策略。结果表明:将研究区农用地分为安全、基本安全、低风险、中风险和高风险5种综合分区,分别采取优先保护、综合监控、预警防控和限制利用等措施,以精细化管理思想为出发点,从源头控制、农艺措施调控、种植作物调整、地类转换以及土壤修复、综合整治等方面提出了各综合分区的安全利用管控策略。因此,开展区域农用地土壤重金属超标评价与安全利用分区研究为确保土地资源合理利用保护耕地提供了重要思路。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Land resource is the unique treasures that nature presents for humanity, and it is unreplaceable resource. In order to make land to be used appropriately and efficiently, evaluating land quality, using and controlling the land resources from deterioration in different ways are the basic requirements to protect cultivated land in China. The current standards of (Environmental quality standards for soils, GB15618-1995) involve less pollutants and have a lot of boundednesses for the fact needs. Experts in China all agree that indicators for the soil environmental quality in current system need to be studied, updated and added. In this paper, the evaluation of limits of soil heavy metals that exceed standards are integrated with existing soil environmental quality assessment and food safety evaluation in different pH values of soil and different land use types. The purpose of agricultural land safety use is to minimize the potential ecological risk of farmland, and at the same time not to affect the growth of crop and the output of edible agricultural products that have no threat to human health, and to maintain the agricultural soil environmental quality. We proposed the soil heavy metal standards evaluation system in this study, which was composed of single factor index evaluation, Nemerow index evaluation, and potential ecological harm index evaluation. We summarized evaluation results of soil from 100 land use types from which the soil heavy metal elements exceeded current standards. Then we built an agricultural land safety use evaluation method through analysis and statistics of those 100 types. In this agricultural land safety use evaluation method, we not only fully expressed agricultural land safety use through terminologies, but also highlighted kinds of influence factors for crop growth and human health, and pointed out the controlling direction of land safety use in the future. Taking a county of Jiangsu Province as an example, the evaluation results of soil heavy metal concentrations that exceeded standards showed that, there were three points of Cd heavy pollution grade, one point of Hg heavy pollution grade, one point of As heavy pollution grade, one point of Pb heavy pollution grade, two points of Cu heavy pollution grade, one point of Zn heavy pollution grade, seven points of Nemerow comprehensive heavy pollution grade, and two points of high potential ecological harm in 884 soil sampling points. There were 165.90 hm2 agricultural land of Cd heavy pollution grade, 11.85 hm2 agricultural land of Hg tiny pollution grade, 11.85 hm2 agricultural land of As slight pollution grade, 11.85 hm2 agricultural land of Pb heavy pollution grade, 23.70 hm2 agricultural land of Cu heavy pollution grade, 11.85 hm2 agricultural land of Zn heavy pollution grade, 272.55 hm2 agricultural land of Nemerow comprehensive heavy pollution grade and 59.25 hm2 agricultural land of high potential ecological harm in 118,500 hm2 agricultural land. The agricultural land safety use evaluation results showed that, there were five different comprehensive safety use zones, 79.52% agricultural land of safe utilization zone (level Ⅰ), 15.38% agricultural land of main safe utilization zone (level Ⅱ), 4.33% agricultural land of low risk monitoring zone (level Ⅲ), 0.51% agricultural land of medium risk warning zone (level Ⅳ) and 0.25% agricultural land of high risk limiting zone (level Ⅴ). This agricultural land safety use evaluation method was demonstrated to be scientific and reasonable by analyzing, contrasting and summarizing the spatial distributions of five safety use zones and the existing local industrial enterprises. Different zones had different characters and needed different using methods, protection measures. The results from the methods and measures showed a need of changing land use types, making a thorough investigation of the pollution sources, controlling the pollution sources, repairing soil environment quality and so on. But the evaluation scale and the strategy of safety use in different ways still needed to be studied in the future. Therefore, it provided an important method for ensuring land resources rational utilization and protecting the cultivated lands by carrying out the regional agricultural land safety use evaluation and zoning study.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回