郭嘉明, 方思贞, 曾志雄, 陆华忠, 吕恩利. 管道式加湿装置湿度场分布的数值模拟及试验验证[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(16): 57-64. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.16.009
    引用本文: 郭嘉明, 方思贞, 曾志雄, 陆华忠, 吕恩利. 管道式加湿装置湿度场分布的数值模拟及试验验证[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(16): 57-64. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.16.009
    Guo Jiaming, Fang Sizhen, Zeng Zhixiong, Lu Huazhong, Lü Enli. Numerical simulation and experimental verification on humidity field for pipeline humidifying device[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(16): 57-64. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.16.009
    Citation: Guo Jiaming, Fang Sizhen, Zeng Zhixiong, Lu Huazhong, Lü Enli. Numerical simulation and experimental verification on humidity field for pipeline humidifying device[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(16): 57-64. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.16.009

    管道式加湿装置湿度场分布的数值模拟及试验验证

    Numerical simulation and experimental verification on humidity field for pipeline humidifying device

    • 摘要: 为掌握管道式加湿装置加湿流场的分布规律,该文针对压差原理的保鲜运输厢体,以脐橙为试验物料,建立厢体的1/4等比例三维紊流数值计算模型,结合有孔模型和组分传输模型,采用SIMPLE算法和壁面函数算法,运用Fluent软件对管道式加湿过程厢体内湿度场进行数值模拟,得出了厢体内纵截面和横截面以及货物表面的湿度分布云图。采用管道式加湿可以在246 s内将厢体内的相对湿度从75%升高到90%,厢体内湿度场分布均匀,相对湿度差小于2%,货物表面的相对湿度差不超过3%。经试验验证,试验结果与模拟结果相吻合,试验值与模拟值相对湿度最大偏差值不超过1.2%。通过所建立的模型研究不同回风道风速、管道直径、开孔数对货物表面湿度分布的影响。研究结果表明:加湿速率随回风道风速和管道直径的增大而增大,开孔数对加湿速率的影响不大(P>0.05);货物表面湿度最大差值随回风道风速的增大而减小,随管道直径的增大先增大后减小,随管道开孔数的增加先减小后增大。该研究结果对于保鲜运输加湿装置的优化设计具有一定的参考价值。

       

      Abstract: Maintaining the humidity in the environment is very important for guaranteeing the qualities and prolonging the shelf-life of fresh products. In order to obtain the distribution characteristics of humidity field when the pipeline humidifying device was working, a transport container for fresh-keeping transportation with a pipeline humidifying device based on differential pressure principle was investigated. In this study, navel orange was used as the test material. A three-dimensional numerical turbulent model of 1/4 ratio of the container was established. The structure of this model was built in PRO/E, and the mesh was generated in ICEMCFD by unstructured mesh method; the maximum size of the cell was 0.05 m and the minimum size was 0.005 m. The humidity distribution in the container with pipeline humidifying device was simulated by adopting Porous Medium Model, Species Transport Model, SIMPLE algorithm and Enhanced Wall Treatment Function method to solve the model in FLUENT. After that, the humidifying rate and the cloud charts of humidity distributions on the longitudinal and cross sections in the container and on the surface of products were obtained. With pipeline humidifying device, the relative humidity in the container could be increased from 75% to 90% in 246 s. The distribution of humidity field in container was uniform and the difference of relative humidity was less than 2%, and the difference of relative humidity on goods surface was no more than 3%. A test in a real container with 75 kg navel oranges was done to verify the accuracy of the model. Experimental validation showed that the test results were in good agreement with the simulation results. The difference between the simulated value and experimental value was less than 1.2%, which proved that such model could be used to study the effects of pipe diameter, number of holes, air velocity of air duct on humidity distribution on products surface. Some comparison and analysis were done for the results, and some conclusions could be drawn. It showed that humidifying rate increased as the velocity of air duct and the diameter of pipe increased; and when the relative humidity at the monitoring point was 90%, the humidifying time was 258, 246, 242 and 236 s, respectively as the velocities of air duct were 2, 4, 6 and 8 m/s , while 255, 252, 246 and 242 s respectively as the diameters of pipe were 12.5, 19.0, 25.4 and 38.1 mm. The effect of the number of holes on the humidifying rate was not significant. The maximum difference of humidity on products surface decreased as the velocity of air duct increased, and the differences were 3.09%, 2.45%, 2.05% and 2.01%, respectively. But it decreased first then increased as the number of holes increased (2, 4, 6 and 8), and the differences were 2.53%, 2.18%, 2.31% and 2.45%, respectively. And it increased first then decreased as the diameter of pipe increased, with the differences being 2.38%, 2.57%, 2.45% and 2.02%, respectively. The results from this study have a certain reference value for the optimization of humidifying device for fresh-keeping transportation containers.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回