项晓敏, 金晓斌, 杜心栋, 孙伟, 周寅康. 基于Ward系统聚类的中国农用地整治实施状况分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6): 257-265. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.06.036
    引用本文: 项晓敏, 金晓斌, 杜心栋, 孙伟, 周寅康. 基于Ward系统聚类的中国农用地整治实施状况分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6): 257-265. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.06.036
    Xiang Xiaomin, Jin Xiaobin, Du Xindong, Sun Wei, Zhou Yinkang. Analysis of farmland consolidation implementation status in China based on Ward hierarchical clustering[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(6): 257-265. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.06.036
    Citation: Xiang Xiaomin, Jin Xiaobin, Du Xindong, Sun Wei, Zhou Yinkang. Analysis of farmland consolidation implementation status in China based on Ward hierarchical clustering[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2015, 31(6): 257-265. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.06.036

    基于Ward系统聚类的中国农用地整治实施状况分析

    Analysis of farmland consolidation implementation status in China based on Ward hierarchical clustering

    • 摘要: 为科学分析当前中国农用地整治的实施特征和空间格局特点,厘清实施状态与规划目标的协调状态,该文基于土地整治项目管理信息,以县域为研究单元,通过整治强度、整治潜力和整治难度3项指标,采用Ward系统聚类法,对2006-2012年中国农用地整治实施状况进行综合分区,并结合既定的规划目标,对实施状态进行了定量分析,得出以下结论:1)高整治强度区主要位于华北平原、三江平原、长江三角洲等传统农区;高整治潜力区主要位于青甘农牧区、黄土高原区等半湿润半干旱地区;高整治难度区主要位于秦巴山地和云贵高原等地形较为复杂的地区。2)研究期内中国农用地整治实施状态可划分为"中高-低-中"(Ⅰ类)、"中-中低-中"(Ⅱ类)、"中高-中高-中高"(Ⅲ类)、"低-中-高"(Ⅳ类)和"高-中低-中"(Ⅴ类)等5种类型,其中以Ⅲ类最为集中,Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类次之,Ⅳ类、Ⅴ类数量较少且分布零散。3)从实施状态与整治规划的协调性看,实施现状与规划确定的农用地整治重点区域、高标准基本农田建设示范县,以及基本农田整治重大工程等重点任务,均存在一定偏差;从与表征经济发展、粮食生产、土地整治活动的分区对比来看,区域差异不甚明显,整治重点尚不突出。该研究成果可为中国土地整治规划评价和宏观制度设计提供参考。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Analyzing implementing characteristics and spatial pattern of land consolidation scientifically is of great theoretical and practical value for improving land consolidation scientific decision-making. In order to make sure the implementation status of farmland consolidation in China and its gap with planning objectives, based on the data acquired from the dataset of consolidation project management from 2006 to 2012, this paper analyzes the implementation status of farmland consolidation at county level by three indices i.e. the intensity, the potential and the difficulty of engineering. Then the Ward hierarchical clustering method is used to produce a comprehensive regionalization of farmland consolidation implementation in China. Finally combined with the established national planning objectives, a quantitative analysis is made macroscopically on the farmland consolidation implementation status in China from 2006 to 2012. The conclusions can be summarized as the following: 1) In terms of the implementation status based on itemized index, the North China Plain, the Sanjiang Plain, the Yellow River Delta, the Yangtze River Delta and other traditional agricultural regions are the main consolidation areas with high intensity during the study period; the consolidation areas with high potential are mainly in semi-humid and semi-arid region, including Inner Mongolia and pastoral areas along the Great Wall, Qinggan agricultural and pastoral areas, the Loess Plateau, etc; the consolidation areas with high difficulty are mainly located in the Loess Plateau, Qilian Mountain region, Qinba Mountains, Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau and other more complex terrain regions. 2) The implementation status of farmland consolidation in China during the study period can be divided into five types consisted of "medium high - low - medium" (ClassⅠ), "medium - medium low - medium" (Class Ⅱ), "medium high - medium high - medium high" (Class Ⅲ), "low - medium - high" (Class Ⅳ) and "high - medium low - medium" (Class Ⅴ). The Class Ⅲ is the most concentrated type, mainly distributed in Shanxi, Gansu and China's other western provinces, and characterized by higher implementation levels of the intensity, the potential and the difficulty of engineering; then ClassⅠand Ⅱ follow, and they are mainly distributed in some areas where natural resources and agricultural production conditions are appropriate, such as the Northeast Plain, the North China Plain, the Middle-lower Yangtze Plain, the Sichuan Basin. This class shows relatively high intensity, low potential and medium difficulty of implementation characteristics. While Class Ⅳ and Ⅴ are small numbers and scattered, Class Ⅳ is mainly distributed in Shanghai, Guangdong and other coastal developed areas and western plateau mountainous, and its characteristics on the performance are lower intensity, medium potential and higher difficulty; Class Ⅴ is mainly distributed in the hilly area of southwestern Zhejiang, Chengdu Plains, agricultural and pastoral areas of northern Inner Mongolia, and its intensity, potential and difficulty of engineering are all at medium and lower levels. 3) In terms of the coordination between implementation status and consolidation planning, there is a certain deviation in the specific implementation of major tasks containing key areas of farmland consolidation, demonstration counties of well-facilitated capital farmland and major consolidation projects of capital farmland. As far as the comparison of consolidation implementation in the different areas be concerned, which is characterized as the economic development, grain production and land consolidation activities, the regional difference is not very significant, and key points of farmland consolidation are still not highlighted. The findings suggest that the guiding role of national land consolidation planning should be strengthened to standardize the provincial farmland consolidation projects; especially in the key areas, the project arrangement and investment of farmland consolidation should be optimized at spatial pattern and implementation structure.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回