朱瑞祥, 李成鑫, 程阳, 闫小丽, 李江, 史岩鹏, 葛世强. 被动式圆盘刀作业性能优化试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(18): 47-54. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.18.006
    引用本文: 朱瑞祥, 李成鑫, 程阳, 闫小丽, 李江, 史岩鹏, 葛世强. 被动式圆盘刀作业性能优化试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(18): 47-54. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.18.006
    Zhu Ruixiang, Li Chengxin, Cheng Yang, Yan Xiaoli, Li Jiang, Shi Yanpeng, Ge Shiqiang. Working performance of passive disc coulter[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2014, 30(18): 47-54. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.18.006
    Citation: Zhu Ruixiang, Li Chengxin, Cheng Yang, Yan Xiaoli, Li Jiang, Shi Yanpeng, Ge Shiqiang. Working performance of passive disc coulter[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2014, 30(18): 47-54. DOI: doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2014.18.006

    被动式圆盘刀作业性能优化试验

    Working performance of passive disc coulter

    • 摘要: 在保护性耕作环境下,为了研究普通圆盘刀、大波纹圆盘刀、缺口圆盘刀等不同类型被动式圆盘刀的作业性能,设计了一种偏角和倾角可调的圆盘刀试验台,并以圆盘刀类型、前进速度、偏角、倾角为因素,圆盘刀破茬率和工作阻力为评价指标,进行了四因素三水平正交试验。结果表明:各因素对破茬率和工作阻力影响的主次顺序依次为:圆盘刀类型、倾角、前进速度、偏角;被动式圆盘刀在给定因素水平上的最优组合是:选用大波纹型圆盘刀,前进速度为5 km/h,偏角为5°,倾角为2°,破茬率为86.17%,工作阻力为3 296.53 N;在低速情况下,圆盘刀滑切破茬效果好于砍切。本研究可为以圆盘刀破茬的深松作业机等农机产品提供设计依据。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Under the environment of protection ploughing, this research designed a kind of test bench on which the sweep and tilt angles of disc coulter can be adjusted precisely in order to study the working performance of different kinds of passive disc coulter: general disc coulter, big ripple disc coulter, notched disc coulter, etc. Simultaneously, this research did four factors and three levels of orthogonal tests by using the factors of the type, velocity, sweep angle, and tilt angle of disc coulter and the evaluation indices of cutting rate and traction resistance. The optimal combination of parameters was achieved through orthogonal tests. Besides, the optimal combination of parameters was repeated verification tests. Fewer factors and levels were studied in this test. And it would take a longer time to do the test if we did a comprehensive test. Therefore, it was a reasonable choice of the orthogonal test. The principle of orthogonal tests was the use of scientific methods to select some representative points so that the points were distributed evenly within the test range. The test could reflect the full test case. Its advantage is to ensure the expected results of the test under the premise of reducing the number of tests and shortening the test cycle. Four factors of this test study were identified through theoretical analysis and access to a large number of relevant literature. Three levels were determined based on relevant literatures and pre-tests. There was no interaction between the factors of this test. So the L9(34) orthogonal table was selected. The results showed that the test bench can adjust the sweep and tilt angles of disc coulter precisely. The adjustment accuracy of sweep angle is 2.5° and the adjustment accuracy of tilt angle is 1°. In the three types of disc coulter, the big ripple disc coulter has the best cutting effect and the notched disc coulter consumes the greatest traction resistance. The primary and secondary order of the effects of every factor on cutting rate and traction resistance is the type, tilt angle, velocity, and sweep angle. The disc coulter type has a very significant effect on the cutting rate and traction resistance. Sweep angle has a minimal impact on the cutting rate and traction resistance. So in terms of cutting rate and traction resistance, it is essential to select the disc coulter type. For the passive disc coulter, the effect of forward speed on cutting rate is not as high as possible in the low speed range. Excessive speed can cause disc coulter slip rates to increase. As a result, the cutting rate will decline. At a given level, the optimal combination of the passive disc coulter is using big ripple disc coulter with the velocity of 5 km/h, sweep angle of 5°, and tilt angle of 2°.. The cutting rate is 86.17% and the traction resistance is 3 296.53 N. There are slashing cutting actions and sliding cutting actions of the three types of disc coulter. In the low speed, the cutting rate effect of sliding cutting action is better than slashing cutting action; the working performance of different types of passive disc coulter under different working conditions is different. This study may provide the basis for the relevant product design.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回