李海龙, 权龙哲, 朱成亮, 韩凯, 王韦韦, 熊永森, 梁永刚, 秦广泉. 大田对靶喷施机器人喷头位置解析与校正[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(18): 21-30. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.18.003
    引用本文: 李海龙, 权龙哲, 朱成亮, 韩凯, 王韦韦, 熊永森, 梁永刚, 秦广泉. 大田对靶喷施机器人喷头位置解析与校正[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(18): 21-30. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.18.003
    Li Hailong, Quan Longzhe, Zhu Chengliang, Han Kai, Wang Weiwei, Xiong Yongsen, Liang Yonggang, Qin Guangquan. Nozzle positions resolving and calibration for the field target spraying robots[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(18): 21-30. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.18.003
    Citation: Li Hailong, Quan Longzhe, Zhu Chengliang, Han Kai, Wang Weiwei, Xiong Yongsen, Liang Yonggang, Qin Guangquan. Nozzle positions resolving and calibration for the field target spraying robots[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(18): 21-30. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.18.003

    大田对靶喷施机器人喷头位置解析与校正

    Nozzle positions resolving and calibration for the field target spraying robots

    • 摘要: 对靶喷施技术是提高药液利用率、减少环境污染的有效手段,针对植保机械在非结构化农田环境中对靶喷施作业准确率低的问题,该研究采用空间误差补偿技术,基于所设计的大田对靶喷施机器人开展喷头位置解析与校正。采用辅助坐标位置关联法,构建基于机器人坐标、航向与结构参数的喷头位置解析模型,采用误差等效变换法,量化耦合误差分解项,最后综合对比各校正方法性能,优选均值校正法对重构的喷头位置解析模型进行校正。平整场地对靶喷施模拟与田间验证试验结果表明:高斯回归建模方法可实现机器人结构参数的准确估计,喷头与定位点的相对高度、相对距离平均偏差分别为4.3和1.3 mm;喷头距靶标中心的响应距离越长,对靶喷施准确率越高,系统稳定性越好;行驶速度为1 m/s时,0、15和30 cm的靶标引导距离下分别有94.4%、96.6%、99.4%样本的对靶喷施精度≤30 mm,对靶喷施准确率的变异系数分别为0.010、0.017、0.010。该研究可为大田机器人的末端执行器精准控制提供思路和方法,为大田植保机械的精准施药技术性能优化提供参考。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: Target spraying can improve the utilization rate of the liquid for less environmental pollution, compared with traditional spraying. There are technical requirements for stable and reliable recognition, as well as accurate nozzle position solving in the spraying system. This research aims to develop and evaluate the accurate position-solving and error correction of nozzles for targeted spraying using a pre-designed field robot. The high accuracy of target spraying was achieved by plant protection machinery in unstructured field environments. The field robot of target spraying was mainly composed of electromagnetic nozzle, suspension, walking chassis, walking and, target spraying control system, as well as the global navigation satellite system. An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) was used to collect the field information for the prescription map with the target spraying operation task. Specifically, the memory card was inserted with the prescription map information into the main board of the target spraying control system, and then to guide the robot for the target spraying. The robot was combined with the positioning and orientation data to solve the coordinates of each nozzle in real time during operation. Among them, the structural parameters of the robot were compared with the prescription diagram, in order to control the movement of the nozzle for target spraying. As such, the on-target spraying operation was implemented during the robot walking in a complex field. The position of the spray nozzles was solved to consider the errors originated from the production, installation, and movement of the components. The cumulative effect of error transmission between moving part was evaluated for each part of the error, compared with the robot kinematics. Among them, the end-to-end coupling error was transformed and described uniformly, and then decomposed and quantified at the end of the error transfer. The final coupling error was equivalently decomposed into the decomposition errors in six directions, including translation errors in three directions, and rotation errors around three axes. The error values were derived within the range of suspension motion under a combination of field measurements and theoretical calculations using Gaussian machine learning. The auto-regression learner established the correspondence between the length of the electric cylinder on the suspension and each error, thus enabling the prediction of the errors and the correction of the nozzle error solution model. The mean correction on the nozzle position of the solution model fully met the requirements of large field operations, compared with the commonly-used one. Finally, the corrected model of the nozzle position solution was deployed to the edge end. Leveling ground and field trials were conducted to verify the model. The results indicated that the accurate estimation of the robot's structural parameters was achieved using the Gaussian regression modelling. The average deviations were 4.3 and 1.3 mm for the relative height and relative distance between the nozzle and the positioning point, respectively. The mean plane error of the nozzle position solution was 8.5 mm. The longer the response distance of the nozzle from the target center was, the higher the target spraying accuracy and the better performance of the system were. The longer the response distance of the nozzle from the target center was, the higher the target spraying accuracy and the better the stability of the system were. Furthermore, 94.4%, 96.6%, and 99.4% of the samples were sprayed to the target with an accuracy ≤30 mm at 0, 15, and 30 cm target guidance distance, and the coefficients of variation were 0.010, 0.017, and 0.010, respectively, when the field travel speed was 1 m/s. Higher accuracy was achieved in the nozzle position solution and operational stability. The accurate calculation and correction of the nozzle position can be used for the precise control of the ground robot end-effector in the air-ground cooperative robot system.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回