Abstract
A canopy-air temperature difference has been one of the most commonly used indicators to monitor soil moisture content. Among them, the time delay effect between canopy and atmospheric temperature can be critical to improving the monitoring accuracy of soil moisture content. Taking the summer maize at the filling stage (Mid-August to early September) as the research object, this study aims to clarify the time delay effect of canopy temperature on the soil moisture content under three water treatments, including I1 (85%-100% of field capacity), I2 (70%-85% of field capacity), and I3 (50%-65% of field capacity). Three high-precision infrared temperature sensors (Apogee SI-411) were also selected to monitor the canopy temperature under three water treatments. An automatic weather station (AWS-CR1000) was used to record the data of the environmental factors, such as the net surface radiation (W/m2), atmospheric temperature (℃), and air relative humidity (%) of the test site. The soil moisture content was measured at the depths of 0-10, 0-20, 0-30, 0-40, and 0-60 cm on August 24, 27, 31, September 3, and 6, 2020 under different water treatments. The interval of data recording was all set at 10 min. Firstly, the diurnal variation of canopy temperature and environmental factors was fitted by Gaussian function, and then the peak time of the fitting curve was determined to calculate the peak time difference as the lag time between canopy temperature and environmental factors. Secondly, a multiple linear regression was selected to determine the main influencing factors of canopy temperature. Finally, the time lag effect on the soil moisture content was analyzed using the lag time between canopy temperature and the main influencing factors. The results showed that: 1) There was a significant difference in the peak of canopy temperature under different water treatments, where the I3 water treatment presented the highest peak value, followed by I2, and I1 water treatment presented the lowest. 2) The peak time of canopy temperature of I1, I2, and I3 water treatment lagged behind the net surface radiation by about 70, 70, and 100 min, respectively, and ahead of the atmospheric temperature and relative humidity by about 60, 60, and 30 min, respectively. 3) The main influencing factor of canopy temperature was the atmospheric temperature, followed by the net surface radiation, and finally the relative humidity. 4) The mean values of canopy-air temperature difference from 11:00 to 13:00 with or without time lag were calculated to consider the correlation between canopy-air temperature difference and soil moisture content at different depths. It was found that the correlation with the time lag was generally higher than that without time lag, where the determination coefficient R2 values with the time lag were 0.684, 0.699, 0.726, 0.615, and 0.516, respectively, the R2 values without the time lag were 0.710, 0.698, 0.713, 0.584, and 0.474, respectively. The R2 values increased by 0.14%, 1.82%, 5.31%, and 8.86% in 0-20, 0-30, 0-40, and 0-60 cm depth, respectively. On the whole, the monitoring accuracy of soil moisture content was improved to consider the time lag between canopy and atmospheric temperature.