卢富运,余方潜,陈杨,等. 盐热联合示踪表征薄层水流剖面流速分布[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(23):85-93. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202306174
    引用本文: 卢富运,余方潜,陈杨,等. 盐热联合示踪表征薄层水流剖面流速分布[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(23):85-93. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202306174
    LU Fuyun, YU Fangqian, CHEN Yang, et al. Combined tracing of salt and heat to characterizevelocity profile of sheet flow[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2023, 39(23): 85-93. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202306174
    Citation: LU Fuyun, YU Fangqian, CHEN Yang, et al. Combined tracing of salt and heat to characterizevelocity profile of sheet flow[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2023, 39(23): 85-93. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.202306174

    盐热联合示踪表征薄层水流剖面流速分布

    Combined tracing of salt and heat to characterizevelocity profile of sheet flow

    • 摘要: 坡面薄层水流流速是重要的水动力学参数之一,研究其分布规律对于理解坡面土壤侵蚀机理具有重要意义。该研究采用盐与热联合示踪的方法,对不同粗糙下垫面的坡面薄层水流流速进行测量,探究下垫面对薄层水流剖面流速分布的作用规律。在3种坡度(5°、10°和20°)下,以下垫面条件(有机玻璃、80目即0.16 mm砂纸和24目即0.53 mm砂纸)、流量(2、5和8 L/min)和示踪剂类型(盐和热)为试验因素,以每个坡长(2、3和4 m)处的水流流速为试验指标进行多因素间的完全试验。结果表明,当下垫面一定,水深为粗糙高度的2~4倍,且水流为层流流态时,盐与热联合示踪的方法可用于表征薄层水流的剖面流速分布;下垫面粗糙高度和水深对薄层水流剖面流速分布具有显著影响(P<0.05)。3种垫面下,2种示踪剂测得流速具有显著的线性相关关系,其线性拟合直线斜率分别为1.015、1.094和1.078,决定系数R2分别为0.892、0.824和0.760。随下垫面粗糙度增加,2种示踪剂测得流速差异呈增大的趋势;床面粗糙高度的增加,加大了对水流的扰动作用,增加了水流的紊动程度,进而影响盐与热2种示踪剂测量水流流速差异性。研究结果可为进一步理解坡面薄层水流的动力过程提供参考。

       

      Abstract: The velocity of sheet flow on slopes is one of the key hydrodynamic parameters, and the velocity profile of sheet flow is important for understanding the soil erosion mechanism. The measurements of the slope sheet flow velocity were conducted under various underlying surfaces roughness through the tracing methods with the salt tracer and heat tracer, respectively, to investigate the influence of the underlying surface on the vertical velocity distribution of the sheet flow. The velocities of sheet flow were measured at three slope lengths (2, 3, and 4 m) under three slope gradients (5°, 10°, and 20°) and three flow rates (2, 5, and 8 L/min) on the slopes with various underlying surface roughness of polymethyl methacrylate, 80-mesh sandpaper (0.16 mm), and 24-mesh sandpaper (0.53 mm), respectively. The measurements were conducted in the water flumes with fixed bed, and the internal size of the flume was 5 m long, 0.2 m wide, and 0.2 m deep. The centroid velocity was adopted as the sheet flow velocity, and hydraulic parameters such as water depth, Reynolds number, Froude number, and Darcy-Weisbach resistance coefficient were also calculated to provide the background information of the experimental water flows. The results showed that the roughness of the underlying surface and the water depth both have significant effects on the velocity profile of the sheet flow (P<0.05). On the smooth underlying surface of polymethyl methacrylate, the boundary layer was fully developed to achieve a turbulent flow. The combined tracing method by using the salt and thermal tracers can be used to characterize the velocity profile of sheet flows when the water depth was 2-4 times of the bed roughness height and the flow was laminar; however, when the water depth were within or well beyond the roughness height, or when the flow was turbulent under the high velocity conditions, the combined tracing method failed to characterize the vertical velocity distribution of the sheet flow. A significant linear correlation was observed between the flow velocities measured by the two tracers, respectively, under the three experimental underlying surfaces (polymethyl methacrylate, 80-mesh sandpaper, and 24-mesh sandpaper), with the slopes of fitted lines of 1.015, 1.094, and 1.078, and the coefficients of determination R2 of 0.892, 0.824, and 0.760, respectively. As the roughness of underlying surface increased, the velocity difference between the two tracers increased as the results of the degree of turbulence of the sheet flow increased, which in turn affected deference in the water flow velocity measured by salt and thermal tracers, respectively. The results can provide a reference for further understanding of the dynamic processes of sheet flow on the slopes.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回