吴宣毅, 佟玲, 康德奎, 王磊, 马冬青, 杨其锟, 郭晓旭. 调亏灌溉对西北地区不同种植密度玉米耗水和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(Z): 59-67. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.z.007
    引用本文: 吴宣毅, 佟玲, 康德奎, 王磊, 马冬青, 杨其锟, 郭晓旭. 调亏灌溉对西北地区不同种植密度玉米耗水和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(Z): 59-67. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.z.007
    Wu Xuanyi, Tong Ling, Kang Dekui, Wang Lei, Ma Dongqing, Yang Qikun, Guo Xiaoxu. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on water consumption and yield of maize under different planting densities in Northwest China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(Z): 59-67. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.z.007
    Citation: Wu Xuanyi, Tong Ling, Kang Dekui, Wang Lei, Ma Dongqing, Yang Qikun, Guo Xiaoxu. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on water consumption and yield of maize under different planting densities in Northwest China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2022, 38(Z): 59-67. DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2022.z.007

    调亏灌溉对西北地区不同种植密度玉米耗水和产量的影响

    Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on water consumption and yield of maize under different planting densities in Northwest China

    • 摘要: 为研究种植密度与调亏灌溉对玉米蒸发蒸腾和产量的影响,该研究2017—2019年连续3 a设置2个种植密度(常规低密度、高密度)和不同灌溉处理开展田间试验。2017年设当地灌溉(W1)、充分灌溉(W2)、全生育期轻度亏缺(W3)、抽穗期充分灌溉其余生育期轻度亏缺(W4)4个水分处理;在2017年试验结果基础上,2018年调整了试验设计,设充分灌溉(W2)、营养生长阶段(苗期末、拔节期)轻度亏缺(W5)、营养生长阶段中度亏缺(W6)3个水分处理;2019年设充分灌溉(W2)、营养生长阶段和灌浆末期轻度亏缺(W7)、营养生长阶段和灌浆末期中度亏缺(W8)3个水分处理。测定和计算了玉米植株茎流、棵间蒸发、冠层覆盖度、产量等指标。结果表明:玉米单株茎流速率受种植密度和水分亏缺的影响明显,复水可以缓解水分亏缺造成的茎流速率降低。高种植密度下,玉米植株对水分胁迫的反映更为敏感,相同水分亏缺程度会造成更严重的减产。相较于低种植密度(当地密度),充分灌溉下(W2)增大种植密度使2017、2018、2019年玉米产量分别提升15.82%、34.89%、22.64%;高密度处理下,相较于当地的经验灌水模式,在作物营养生长阶段后期及灌浆后期进行轻度亏水处理可在产量下降不显著的情况下节水约23.14%。因此,增大种植密度并在作物营养生长阶段后期及灌浆后期进行轻度亏水,可在显著增大产量的同时大幅减少耗水,结果为西北地区玉米节水增产提供科学依据。

       

      Abstract: Abstract: In order to study the effects of planting density and regulated deficit irrigation on transpiration, soil evaporation and yield of maize, two planting densities (conventional low density D1 and high density D2) and different irrigation treatments were used in field experiments for three consecutive years from 2017 to 2019 (2017 and 2018 is the maize for seed). The experiment was conducted at the national field scientific observation and research station on efficient water use of oasis agriculture in Wuwei of Gansu Province (102°51′E, 37°52′N). In 2017, four water treatments were set: local irrigation (W1), full irrigation (W2), mild deficit (2/3 of full irrigation per irrigation) in the whole growth period (W3), and full irrigation at silking stage, mild deficit in the rest growth period (W4). Based on the experiment in 2017, the experimental design was adjusted in 2018 with three water treatments: full irrigation (W2), mild deficit (W5) in vegetative growth stage (end of seedling stage, jointing stage), and medium deficit (1/2 of full irrigation amount per irrigation) in vegetative growth stage (W6). In 2019, there were three water treatments: full irrigation (W2), mild deficit at the vegetative growth stage and end of filling (W7), and medium deficit at the vegetative growth stage and end of filling (W8). In 2017, it was border irrigation under film, drip irrigation under film in 2018 and 2019, local irrigation (W1) was irrigated with fixed irrigation amount, and the rest water treatment was irrigated according to soil moisture content. The effects of different planting densities and irrigation treatments on stem flow, soil evaporation between plants, canopy coverage (CC), yield and yield response factors of maize were studied in the experiment. The results showed that the stem flow rate of maize per plant was significantly affected by planting density and water deficit, increasing planting density and water deficit would reduce the stem flow rate of maize, and rewatering could alleviate the decrease of stem flow rate caused by water deficit. Compared with water deficit, planting density has a more obvious effect on CC, and high density treatment has a larger CC. There was no significant difference in soil evaporation during the whole growth period of each treatment. Increasing planting density in all three years of experiments increased yield while decreasing 100-grain quality (except for the 100-grain quality in 2018). Water deficit in the whole growth period obviously resulted in the decrease of yield, while the water regulation deficit in the partial growth period had no significant effect on the yield. At high planting densities, maize plants are more sensitive to water stress, and the same degree of water deficit can cause more severe yield reduction. Compared with local irrigation methods, full irrigation based on soil water content can save 15.09% of water without significant yield change. Increasing planting density under adequate irrigation (W2) increased maize yield by 15.82%, 34.89% and 22.64% in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively, compared to low planting density (local density). Compared to local empirical irrigation practices, a mild water deficit treatment (W7) at the late vegetative growth stage and late filling stage of the crop under high density (D2) could save about 23.14% of water with no significant yield reduction. Therefore, increasing planting density and conducting mild water deficit at late vegetative growth stage and late filling stage of the crop can significantly increase yield and reduce water consumption, and the results provide scientific basis for further water saving and yield increase of maize in Northwest China.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回