全域土地综合整治促进耕地稳定利用的作用机制和成效评估

    Action mechanism and Effectiveness evaluation of comprehensive land consolidation on promoting cropland stable utilization

    • 摘要: 为揭示全域土地综合整治促进耕地稳定利用的作用机制与实践成效,该研究基于“格局—利用—产能”递进维度构建理论框架和评价体系,以旧馆项目为例开展实证研究,利用Google Earth Engine平台和FRAGSTATS软件,结合遥感反演模型、累计植被指数模型进行指标计算,通过熵值法和综合指数法测度各维度评价指数及其趋势指数。结果表明:1)研究区耕地稳定利用指数对应的趋势指数为17.45,整治成效总体良好;2)格局指数、利用指数、产能指数对应的趋势指数分别为17.27、18.93和15.93,耕地趋于集中连片,用地效率明显提升,粮食产能显著增强;3)全域土地综合整治的规模与成效呈正相关关系,相关系数达到0.88(α=0.01),当工程占地比例达到5.10%时,规模效应达到最大。研究提出的作用机制、评价体系和实证结论可为有关部门推进相关项目的路径优化和监测评估提供理论指导、技术支撑和结果参考,具有良好的推广应用前景;全域土地综合整治通过“优格局—促利用—提产能”路径促进耕地稳定利用,其中空间治理为适度规模经营奠定了空间基础,而适度规模经营就是耕地稳定利用得以实现的关键。

       

      Abstract: Comprehensive land consolidation, as the latest tool for addressing the dilemma of cropland marginalization in China, is centered on ensuring the cropland stable utilization through spatial restructuring. However, it is still underdeveloped in terms of theoretical construction, monitoring methods, and effectiveness evaluation. This study analyzed the action mechanism by which comprehensive land consolidation promotes the cropland stable utilization based on the progressive dimensions of "pattern-utilization-capacity", and constructed an indicator system to evaluate the implementation effectiveness with conducting empirical research in Jiuguan Project, Huzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China. Utilizing the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform and FRAGSTATS software, combined with remote sensing inversion models and the Cumulative Vegetation Index (CVI) model, the study conducted overall and zoned evaluations of cropland layout, land use efficiency, and grain production capacity, which resulted in the formation of Pattern Index (PI), Utilization Index (UI), Capacity Index (CI), and Cropland Stable Utilization Index (CSUI), as well as their trend indices, which were usd to reflect the effectiveness of comprehensive land consolidation. The results indicated that: (1) the trend index of CSUI was 17.45, indicating overall good consolidation effectiveness; (2) the trend indices of PI, UI, and CI were 17.27, 18.93, and 15.93, respectively, indicating cropland tended to be concentrated and contiguous, land use efficiency had significantly improved, and grain production capacity had been significantly enhanced; (3) there was a positive correlation between consolidation scale and effectiveness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.88 (α=0.01), and when the propotion of land occupied by the project reached 5.10%, the scale effect reached its maximum. Based on these findings, the following conclusions were drawn: Comprehensive land consolidation effectively promotes the cropland stable utilization through the pathway of "optimizing pattern-promoting utilization-enhancing capacity", which means by advancing the suitable restructuring of cropland layout, comprehensive land consolidation is able to create spatial conditions for moderate-scale agricultural operations, therefrom improves cropland utilization efficiency and grain production capacity, and as the scale of the project expands, pattern, capacity, and comprehensive dimensions achieve maximum scale effects in turn. Based on these conclusions, the following policy recommendations were proposed: (1) Grasp the core positioning of spatial governance in comprehensive land consolidation, and consolidate the leading function of grain production by reconstructing agricultural production space; (2) Leverage the key role of moderate scale operations in the cropland stable utilization, and create spatial conditions conducive to the scale operation; (3) Fully consider the impact of scale effect on the effectiveness of comprehensive land consolidation, and control the propotion of land occupied by the project to about 5% of the total area of consolidation region to maximize resource utilization efficiency. In summary, the proposed action mechanism in the study provided theoretical guidance for optimizing the pathway of related projects, and the constructed effectiveness evaluation system and methods provided a tool system with accessible data, easy-to-operate methods, and convenient promotion for relevant departments to conduct in-depth monitoring and evaluation, and the empirical conclusions could serve as a reference for related effectiveness evaluation results. All of the above have good prospects for promotion and application.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回