基于HS-SPME-GC-MS的肉粉VOCs分析与表征新鲜度的关键VOCs筛选

    Analysis of meat meal VOCs based on HS-SPME-GC-MS and selection of key VOCs for freshness characterization

    • 摘要: 为了分析不同新鲜度肉粉中关键挥发性物质(volatile substances,VOCs),探究肉粉新鲜度指标与VOCs的相关性,选择与新鲜度可能产生响应的电子鼻气体传感器。该研究以饲料原料猪肉粉和鸡肉粉为研究对象,利用标准方法测定肉粉样品的新鲜度指标,采用顶空固相微萃取方法(headspace gas chromatography ion mobility spectrometry,HS-SPME-GS-MS)对不同新鲜度肉粉样本中VOCs进行检测。通过单因素结合响应面试验对肉粉萃取条件进行优化,确定最佳萃取条件为:萃取纤维头类型为50/30µm DVB/CAR/PDMS;萃取温度为80 ℃;萃取时间为40 min;平衡时间为30 min和解析时间为5 min。基于最优萃取条件组合,对不同新鲜度肉粉样品的VOCs进行检测分析,猪肉粉和鸡肉粉中分别检测到128和114种挥发性物质。结合新鲜度指标挥发性盐基氮(total volatile base nitrogen,TVB-N)、酸价(acid value,AV)、pH值、霉菌总数(total viable count,TVC)测定结果对肉粉的新鲜度进行分类,采用正交偏最小二乘判别分析(orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis,OPLS-DA)和Pearson相关性分析筛选出与猪肉粉和鸡肉粉新鲜度显著相关的特征VOCs,即变量重要性投影值(variable importance in projection, VIP)大于1,皮尔逊相关系数(correlation coefficient, r)绝对值大于0.5,且相关性显著P值<0.05。最终筛选出与猪肉粉和鸡肉粉显著相关的特征VOCs分别为25种和17种,其中十七烷、1-辛烯-3-醇、2-丁基-2-辛烯醛和顺式-9-十六烯醛为共有特征VOCs。基于筛选出的特征VOCs,选择了可能与新鲜度指标产生响应的10种气体传感器。研究结果对肉粉VOCs的检测及表征影响肉粉新鲜度的特征VOCs提供科学依据,为肉粉新鲜度检测电子鼻气体传感器的选型提供参考。

       

      Abstract: Meat meal is one of the most crucial feed ingredients, rich in high-quality animal proteins, fats, minerals, and vitamins. The high nutritional value can also provide the essential amino acids for animal growth and immune function. However, the meat meal is susceptible to environmental and storage factors during processing, transportation, and storage, leading to varying freshness and quality deterioration. The freshness of the meat meal can decline significantly during storage over time, due to microbial activity and enzymatic reactions. Thus, the protein degradation and lipid oxidation can cause nutrient loss. Concurrently, aldehydes, ketones, heterocycles, and acids can accumulate as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), leading to undesirable odors, such as rancidity and putrefaction. Ultimately, there is a low freshness grade of the feed ingredient. This study aims to analyze the VOCs in the meat meal at different freshness levels. A systematic investigation was also made to explore the correlation between freshness indicators and VOCs. The gas sensors were selected to be responsive to the freshness-related VOCs. The pork and chicken meal were selected as the feed ingredients. The national standard was employed to determine the freshness indicators. After that, the headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) was utilized to detect the VOCs in the meat meal samples with the varying freshness levels. Extraction parameters were optimized using single-factor experiments and the response surface method. The optimal parameters were then determined as follows: fiber type, 50/30 µm DVB/CAR/PDMS; extraction temperature, 80°C; extraction time, 40 min; equilibrium time, 30 min; and desorption time, 5 min. According to the optimal extraction, the 128 and 114 VOCs were identified from the pork and chicken meal, respectively. These VOCs encompassed alcohols, aldehydes, esters, ketones, acids, phenols, hydrocarbons, and heterocycles. Aldehydes and heterocycles were the predominant components. Freshness classification was performed on four freshness indicators (TVB-N, AV, pH, and TVC). Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) was conducted with the relative abundances of 242 VOCs via GC-MS as input variables (X), while freshness classification was used as categorical labels (Y) to establish the OPLS-DA model. The results demonstrated that the robust performance of the prediction was achieved, with R²X = 0.872, R²Y = 0.982, and Q² = 0.941 for PM, and R²X = 0.819, R²Y = 0.987, and Q² = 0.965 for CM, both meeting Q² > 0.5. Furthermore, the variable importance in the projection (VIP) scores was used to identify the key VOCs influencing meat meal freshness, with the variables of VIP > 1 being considered the most influential. According to this criterion, 38 and 31 VOCs were identified as the key freshness- and quality-related compounds in the pork and chicken meal, respectively, with 10 shared key VOCs: three hydrocarbons (2,6,10-trimethyl tetradecane, heptadecane, and naphthalene), four aldehydes (benzaldehyde, 2-butyl-2-octenal, nonanal, and (Z)-hexadecenal), one acid (hexanoic acid), one ketone (2-decanone), and one alcohol (1-octen-3-ol). Pearson correlation analysis was performed between freshness indicators and VOCs, in order to elucidate the relationship between key VOCs and meat meal freshness. The 25 and 17 VOCs were identified in the pork and chicken meal, respectively, as significantly correlated with the freshness indicators (TVB-N, AV, pH, and TVC). Among them, heptadecane, 1-octen-3-ol, 2-butyl-2-octenal, and (Z)-hexadecenal also shared the characteristic VOCs. 10 gas sensors were chosen potentially responsive to the freshness indicators. These findings can provide a scientific basis for the VOC detection and the freshness of the meat meal using gas sensors.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回